Research on the International Higher Education Innovation Ecosystem——Take Stanford University as An Example

Abstract

Abstract: The innovation paradigm has entered a new stage in the reform, and university innovation education will also be closely related to the improvement of the science and technology industry. It will have a profound and long-term impact on the future world structure. Taking Stanford University as an example, it summarizes the research, application, and system of its innovation ecosystem. Based on the innovation paradigm 3.0, it analyzes the characteristics of Stanford University's innovation ecosystem through case description. It summarizes the experience and enlightenment for my country's universities to establish an innovation ecosystem.

Key words: Innovation paradigm, Innovation ecosystem, Experience inspiration

CLC Number:

F124

ZHU Yancong, HUANG Jinge, XIAO Kai, PAN Wenjie, LIU Wei. Research on the International Higher Education Innovation Ecosystem——Take Stanford University as An Example[J]. The Theory and Practice of Innovation and Enntrepreneurship, 2021, 4(6): 25-29.

References

[1] 李万, 常静, 王敏杰, 等. 创新3.0与创新生态系统[J].科学学研究, 2014(12):1761-1770.
[2] 杜栋,洪璟玥.高校创新创业生态系统的全景分析与综合评价[J].中国高等教育评估,2018,29(3):37-44.
[3] Wahed L, Candidatu C, Grigore L N .The Importance of the Quadruple Helix Model in Emphasizing the Relationship between Higher Education and the Innovation Process[C]// PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECONOMICS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES. Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania, 2018.
[4] About Bio -X. Stanford Bio-X[EB/OL]. (2018-9-13) [2020-8-26].https://biox.stanford.edu/about.
[5] 潘璐. 斯坦福大学创新创业教育课程体系建设经验及对我国的启示[J].科技资讯,2019,17(35):153-154.
[6] LaFrance D L, Weiss M J, Kazemi E, et al. Multidisciplinary teaming: Enhancing collaboration through increased understanding[J]. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 2019, 12(3): 709-726.
[7] Lei J, Anbang X.Study on the Institutionalization Foundation and Organizational Form Innovation of Interdisciplinary Research in American Research Universities[J]. China Higher Education Research, 2019(1):60-65.
[8] 陈志. 论创新政策趋势与创新政策3.0[J]. 科技中国, 2018(9):53-55.
[9] Domingo L, Moore D, Sirkin D, et al.STRATEGIC PROTOTYPING TO LEARN IN STANFORD UNIVERSITY'S ME310 DESIGN INNOVATION COURSE[C]//Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference. Cambridge University Press, 2020, 1: 1687-1696.
[10] 胡波, 冯辉, 韩伟力,等. 加快新工科建设,推进工程教育改革创新——“综合性高校工程教育发展战略研讨会” 综述[J]. 复旦教育论坛,2017,15(2):20-27,2.
[11] Apfel R E, Jeremijenko N.SynThesis: integrating real world product design and business development with the challenges of innovative instruction[J]. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2001, 17(4/5): 375-380.
[12] BIO-X CORPORATE FORUM [EB/OL]. (2019-4-12) [2020-8-29].http://web.stanford.edu/group/biox/forum/index.html.
[13] Student Groups[EB/OL]. (2018-3-18) [2020-9-6].http://sen.stanford.edu.
[14] 肖凤翔, 王珩安. 世界一流大学跨学科学术组织发展的经验与启示——基于斯坦福大学Bio-X计划的分析[J]. 高教探索, 2020(5):46-51,57.
[15] 刘爱生. 世界一流大学人才培养、教师发展与院长职责——斯坦福大学教育学院院长施瓦兹·单访谈录[J].高校教育管理,2016,10(4):1-5,43.
[16] Molenberghs G. Biometry, Biometrics, Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, Bio‐X[J]. Biometrics, 2005, 61(1): 1-9.
[17] 张乔. 教育生态理论视域下创新创业教育共同体构建的思考[J]. 时代教育, 2018(9):82-83.
[18] 周廷勇, 周作宇. 高等教育质量观的理论反思[J]. 大学教育科学, 2018,2(2):9-18.
[19] 周作宇, 马佳妮. 人类命运共同体:高等教育国际合作的价值坐标[J]. 教育研究, 2017, 38(12):42-50,67.
[20] 毕颖, 杨小渝. 面向科技前沿的大学跨学科研究组织协同创新模式研究——以斯坦福大学Bio-X计划为例[J]. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2017, 56(1):165-173.