创新创业理论研究与实践 ›› 2023, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (23): 18-24.

• 理论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

学生中心导向下的创新创业课程教学效果的评价与改进

王怡1, 郭萌1,2   

  1. 1.商洛学院 创新创业学院 陕西高校新型智库商洛发展研究院,陕西商洛 726000;
    2.陕西师范大学 教育学部,陕西西安 710062
  • 发布日期:2024-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 郭萌(1981—),男,陕西商洛人,博士研究生,副教授,研究方向:教育领导与管理,电子邮箱:2654485101@qq.com。
  • 作者简介:王怡(1978—),女,陕西商洛人,博士研究生,教授,研究方向:创新创业教育。
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省哲学社会科学研究专项/2023 年度高等教育服务创新驱动发展战略研究项目“浸润式融合创新创业教育的新探索”(2023HZ1350); 陕西省本科和高等继续教育教学改革研究重点攻关项目“应用型高校创新创业教育生态系统构建的探索与实践”(23BG047); 陕西教师发展研究计划项目“应用型高校教师教研相长促进专业发展的培养模式研究”(2022JSY016); 商洛学院教育教学改革研究重点项目“应用型高校创新创业教育‘金师'胜任力多维测评及提升路径研究”(22jyjx104)

Innovation and Entrepreneurship Curriculum Teaching under the Student Centered Guidance: Evaluation and Implementation

WANG Yi1, GUO Meng1,2   

  1. 1. Innovation and Entrepreneurship Academy, Shangluo University, The New Style Think Tank of Shaanxi Universities Shangluo Development Research Institute, Shangluo Shaanxi, 726000, China;
    2. College of Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an Shaanxi, 710062, China
  • Published:2024-04-15

摘要: 创新创业教育课程是高校培养有创新意识与创业能力,服务经济社会发展的高素质人才的基本单元。对标“金课”标准,该文引入“课程层面学生投入调查问卷”(CLASSE)进行创新创业教育课程教学效果评价,尝试回答创新创业课程教学效果在对标“学生中心、产出导向、持续改进”理念中有哪些不足,应该从哪些方面改进。量表通过了信度检验,验证性因子分析结果聚合效度良好、构建理念具有内部一致性、区分效度良好。测评结果表明:在构建的创新创业课程学生投入的四项维度指标中,从低到高依次为师生合作互动、主动合作学习、课程挑战度、过程评价。题项得分较低的是在课程中指导其他学生、在课堂上/课程中提问、做课堂汇报。说明“以学生为中心”的理念尚未形成,创新创业课程的教学理念、教学模式需不断改革。基于此,遵循“以学生为中心”导向,根据创新创业课程目标定位,提出了创新创业教育课程体系的构建要求与内容架构。

关键词: “以学生为中心”, 创新创业课程, CLASSE量表, 课程效果测量, 评价, 因子分析

Abstract: The reform of teaching is deeply rooted in the curriculum, and the innovation and entrepreneurship education curriculum is the basic unit for universities to cultivate high-quality talents with innovative awareness and entrepreneurial ability, serving economic and social development. Benchmarking the“Golden Course”standard, introducing the“Curriculum Level Student Input Survey Questionnaire”(CLASSE) for evaluating the teaching effectiveness of innovation and entrepreneurship education courses, attempting to answer the shortcomings of the teaching effectiveness of innovation and entrepreneurship curriculum in benchmarking the concept of“student-centered, output oriented, and continuous improvement”, and where to improve from. The scale passed the reliability test, and the confirmatory factor analysis results showed good aggregation validity, internal consistency in the construction concept, and good discriminant validity. The evaluation results show that among the four dimensional indicators of student investment in the innovation and entrepreneurship curriculum, from low to high, they are teacher-student cooperation and interaction, active cooperative learning, curriculum challenges, and process evaluation. The items with lower scores are guiding other students in the course, asking questions in class/class, and giving classroom presentations. The“student-centered”approach has not yet been formed, and the teaching philosophy and mode of innovation and entrepreneurship courses need to be continuously reformed. Based on this, following the“student-centered”approach and positioning the innovation and entrepreneurship curriculum goals, the construction requirements, content structure, and improvement path of the innovation and entrepreneurship education curriculum system are proposed.

Key words: “Student-centered approach”, Innovation and entrepreneurship curriculum, CLASSE scale, Curriculum quality evaluation, Evaluation, Factor analysis

中图分类号: