创新创业理论研究与实践 ›› 2025, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (24): 5-7.

• 理论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

DOPS评估联合BOPPPS教学法在急诊科“住培”医师心肺复苏教学中的应用

王艳秀, 班志红, 闫美花, 马艳, 姜南星, 叶玲, 曹雯   

  1. 广西中医药大学附属国际壮医医院,广西南宁 530200
  • 出版日期:2025-12-25 发布日期:2026-05-14
  • 通讯作者: 曹雯(1987—),女,广西柳州人,博士研究生,副主任药师,研究方向:临床药物治疗学,电子邮箱:260121355@qq.com。
  • 作者简介:王艳秀(1989—),女,广西桂林人,硕士研究生,主管药师,研究方向:临床药物治疗学。
  • 基金资助:
    广西壮族自治区2022年学位与研究生教育改革课题“广西民族医学硕士专业学位研究生实践技能提升研究”(JGY2022167); 广西壮族自治区卫生健康委自筹经费科研课题“基于DOPS评价的BOPPPS教学法在急诊科住院医师规范化培训中的探索与实践”(Z-A20240814); 广西中医药大学2023年校级教育教学改革与研究项目“BOPPPS-PBL-CBL教学方法应用于门诊中药房实习带教的探索与研究”(2023B062); 广西国际壮医医院“青苗工程”人才培育项目(2022001)

Application of DOPS Assessment Combined with BOPPPS Teaching Method in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Teaching for Emergency Department “Resident Trainees” Physicians

WANG Yanxiu, BAN Zhihong, YAN Meihua, MA Yan, JIANG Nanxing, YE Ling, CAO Wen   

  1. International Zhuang Medicine Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning Guangxi, 530200, China
  • Online:2025-12-25 Published:2026-05-14

摘要: 目的 探讨DOPS(操作技能直接观察)评估联合BOPPPS教学法在急诊科“住培”医师心肺复苏教学中的应用效果。方法 选取2025年3月至8月在急诊科轮转的“住培”医师60名,按照轮转批次随机分为对照组(传统教学)和观察组(DOPS评估联合BOPPPS教学),每组30人,比较两组的理论成绩、操作技能和教学满意度评分,对比观察组入科和出科时心肺复苏技能操作DOPS量化评分结果。结果 观察组心肺复苏理论成绩、操作技能评分和满意度得分均高于对照组(P<0.05),观察组的出科DOPS评分高于入科时(P<0.05)。结论 在急诊科“住培”医师心肺复苏教学中应用DOPS评估联合BOPPPS教学法能显著提升其综合能力,提高急诊临床教学质量。

关键词: DOPS, BOPPPS, 急诊, 临床教学, 住院医师规范化培训, 心肺复苏术

Abstract: Objective Exploring the application effect of DOPS (Direct Observation and Assessment of Operational Skills) evaluation combined with BOPPPS teaching method in the teaching of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for emergency department “resident training”physicians. Method Select 60“residency training”physicians who will rotate in the emergency department from March to August 2025, and randomly divide them into a control group (traditional teaching) and an observation group (DOPS assessment combined with BOPPPS teaching) according to the rotation batch, with 30 people in each group. Compare the theoretical scores, operational skills, and teaching satisfaction scores of the two groups, and compare the quantitative DOPS scores of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills during admission and exit of the observation group. Result The theoretical score, operational skill score, and satisfaction score of the observation group were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05), and the DOPS score of the observation group was higher at the time of admission than at the time of admission (P<0.05). Conclusion The application of DOPS assessment combined with BOPPPS teaching method in the teaching of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for “resident trainees”in the emergency department can significantly improve their comprehensive abilities and enhance the quality of emergency clinical teaching.

Key words: DOPS, BOPPPS, Emergency treatment, Clinical teaching, Standardized training for resident physicians, CPR

中图分类号: