创新创业理论研究与实践 ›› 2024, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (8): 123-127.

• 模式探索 • 上一篇    下一篇

BOPPPS+CBL教学在牙周病学本科教学的探索和实践

蒋兰岚, 杨婉荣, 梅国城, 曾启新, 陶人川   

  1. 广西医科大学,广西南宁 530021
  • 出版日期:2024-04-25 发布日期:2024-07-17
  • 通讯作者: 陶人川(1973—),女,重庆人,博士研究生,教授,研究方向:高等教育,电子邮箱:renchuantao@qq.com。
  • 作者简介:蒋兰岚(1985—),女,广西桂林人,博士研究生,副主任医师,研究方向:高等教育。
  • 基金资助:
    广西研究生教育计划项目“以岗位胜任力为导向的口腔医学专业学位硕士研究生健康促进能力培养优化研究与实践”(JCY2023074); 广西医科大学本科教育教学改革项目“BOPPPS+CBL教学在牙周病学本科教学的探索和实践”(2022XJGY28); 广西壮族自治区卫生健康委员会适宜技术项目“灼口综合征患者认知及相关生物标志物筛选研究”(S2022119)

Exploration and Practice of BOPPPS+CBL Teaching in Undergraduate Periodontology Teaching

JIANG Lanlan, YANG Wanrong, MEI Guocheng, ZENG Qixin, TAO Renchuan   

  1. Guangxi Medical University, Nanning Guangxi, 530021, China
  • Online:2024-04-25 Published:2024-07-17

摘要: 目的探索BOPPPS联合CBL教学在牙周病学本科教学中的效果。方法将广西医科大学口腔医学院2018级和2019级116名本科生作为研究对象,分为试验组和对照组,各58人。对照组实施传统教学方法,试验组实施BOPPPS联合CBL教学。比较两组理论知识、病例分析能力及操作技能。采用SPSS 20.0进行t检验和卡方检验。结果试验组理论知识(76.85±11.38)分、病例分析(35.11±7.29)分、技能操作(93.62±1.47)分;均高于对照组理论知识(68.55±7.23)分、病例分析(26.31±7.23)分、技能操作(86.41±9.67)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组教学效果各项评分均比对照组理论知识高(P<0.05)。相较于对照组教学满意度(82.76%),试验组教学满意度(96.55%)更高(P<0.05)。结论BOPPPS+CBL教学在牙周病学本科教学中应用效果较好,可提高学生的理论知识掌握度、思维分析能力及操作技能,使其能够更好地将理论知识应用于实际操作中,提升综合素质。

关键词: BOPPPS, CAL, 牙周病学, 口腔医学, 教学模式, 病例分析

Abstract: ObjectiveTo explore the effect of BOPPPS combined with CBL in the undergraduate teaching of periodontology. Methods116 undergraduates from the School of Stomatology of Guangxi Medical University in 2018 and 2019 were divided into experimental group and control group, 58 in each group. The control group was taught by traditional teaching methods, and the experimental group was taught by BOPPPS combined with CBL. The theoretical knowledge, case analysis ability and operation skill of the two groups were compared. SPSS 20.0 was used for T-test and Chi-square test. ResultsCompared with the control group, the scores of theoretical knowledge (76.85±11.38), case analysis (35.11±7.29) and skill operation (93.62±1.47) in experimental group were higher than those in control group (68.55±7.23), (26.31±7.23) and (86.41±9.67)(P<0.05). Compared with control group, the scores of teaching effect in experimental group were higher (P < 0.05). The teaching satisfaction of experimental group was 96.55% higher than that of control group (82.76%), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). ConclusionBOPPPS+CBL has a good effect in the undergraduate teaching of periodontology, which can improve students'acquire of theoretical knowledge, thinking analysis ability and operational skills, and enable them to better apply theoretical knowledge to practical operation to improve their comprehensive quality.

Key words: BOPPPS, CAL, Periodontology, Stomatology, Teaching mode, Case analysis

中图分类号: