创新创业理论研究与实践 ›› 2023, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (3): 27-31.

• 教学革新 • 上一篇    下一篇

大学物理实验线上线下混合式教学研究

钱小青   

  1. 宁波大学 物理科学与技术学院,浙江宁波 315211
  • 发布日期:2023-05-22
  • 作者简介:钱小青(1978-),女,浙江慈溪人,硕士,讲师,研究方向:物理实验教学与研究,E-mail:qianxiaoqing@nbu.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    宁波市教育规划课题:“互联网+”时代大学物理实验课程混合式教学研究与实践(项目编号:2020YGH010); 宁波大学教学改革研究课题:新工科背景下大学物理实验课程改革(项目编号JYXM2023068)

Reasearch on the College Physics Experiment Online and Offline Blending Teaching

QIAN Xiaoqing   

  1. School of Physical Science and Technology, Ningbo University, Ningbo Zhejiang, 315211, China
  • Published:2023-05-22

摘要: 该文通过对近年来大学物理实验采用的三种不同教学方法的教学效果进行定量研究,对2019年实施的传统全线下教学,2020年实施的“居家+虚拟仿真+线下”组合套餐式教学,2021实施的线上线下混合式教学三种不同模式下学生成绩等相关数据分析比较,得出线上线下混合式模式优于传统全线下教学模式和套餐组合式教学模式的结论。该模式提升了大学物理实验成绩,激发了学生的研究兴趣,提高了学生分析问题、解决问题的能力。通过探讨现阶段大学物理实验线上线下混合式教学模式的优缺点,提出下阶段需重构课程内容、调整与优化教学模式、构建多元化的过程性评价指标体系。

关键词: 混合式教学, 大学物理实验, 虚拟仿真实验, 教学方法, 教学效果, 定量研究

Abstract: We try an quantitative reasearch on the teaching effect of college physics experiment by three different teaching methods. Through the analysis of the teaching data, teaching of traditional mode in 2019, teaching of "home control experiment + virtual simulation experiment +traditional experiment" combined package in 2020,teaching of blending learning in 2021, it came finally the conclusion that the blending learning is superior to the others. This teaching mode improves the performance of college physics experiment, cultivates students’ability to analyze and solve problems. This study further discusses the advantages and disadvantages of blending teaching, puts forward the targets of the next period are reconstruction of course content, optimization of teaching mode ,constructing diversified process evaluation.

Key words: Blending learning, College physics experiment, Virtual simulation experiment, Teaching method, Teaching effectiveness, Quantitative research

中图分类号: