创新创业理论研究与实践 ›› 2021, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (23): 6-8.

• 理论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

大类培养模式下不同专业教育产出的比较研究

程希冉   

  1. 中北大学,山西太原 030051
  • 出版日期:2021-12-10 发布日期:2022-03-18
  • 作者简介:程希冉(1993-),女,山西长治人,硕士,助教,研究方向:思想政治教育。

A Comparative Study of Educational Outputs of Different Majors in the General Training Mode

CHENG Xiran   

  1. North University of China, Taiyuan Shanxi, 030051,China
  • Online:2021-12-10 Published:2022-03-18

摘要: 如今,大类招生培养模式已成众多高校本科生培养改革的新趋势。对M大学C学院2017级大类培养模式下不同专业学生教育产出进行研究,通过横纵向对比并运用非参数检验方法比较不同专业学生教育产出水平差异。结果表明,不同专业学生成绩的均值有显著差异,但分流培养的“入口”与“出口”专业排名不同,且分流后三年不同专业成绩的相对排名有不同程度变化。从而说明“入口”的教育产出并不能完全决定“出口”的教育产出。因此高校应开展相应工作增强学生专业认同感,引导学生理性选择适合自己的专业,建立完善的就业指导体系,提高人才培养质量。

关键词: 大类培养, 非参数检验, 教育产出

Abstract: Recently, the general enrollment and training mode has become a new trend in the reform of undergraduate training in many universities. This article studies the educational output of students of different majors in general training mode of C college of M university in the 2017,and uses horizontal and vertical contrast and non-parametric tests to compare the differences in the educational output levels of different majors. The result shows, there is a significant difference in the mean of grades of different majors. However, the “entry” and “export” of diversified training are ranked differently. And the relative rankings of grades in different major have changed to varying degrees in the three years after general training. It means that the educational output of the “import” does not completely determine the educational output of “export”. Therefore, universities should carry out corresponding work to enhance students' sense of professional identity, guide students to choose their majors rationally, establish a complete guidance system of employment, and improve the quality of talent training.

Key words: General training, Non-parametric test, Educational outputs

中图分类号: