破“五唯”背景下研究生导师评价体系研究

创新创业理论研究与实践 ›› 2021, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (19): 88-90.

破“五唯”背景下研究生导师评价体系研究

钱玲

南京林业大学,江苏南京 210037

出版日期:2021-10-10 发布日期:2021-12-17
作者简介:钱玲（1980-）,女,安徽池州人,硕士,助理研究员,研究方向：教师评价。
基金资助:
江苏高校哲学社会科学研究基金项目“双一流”建设背景下高校教师绩效评价指标与方法研究（编号：2018SJA0139）

Performance Assessing System for Graduate Tutor under the Background of “Break Five Only”

QIAN Ling

Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing Jiangsu,210037, China

Online:2021-10-10 Published:2021-12-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 该文首先分析当前研究生导师绩效评价过程中的主要问题：忽视师德师风考核,忽视学生培养水平考核,忽视个人发展,忽视差异性评价,研究生指标分配等方面论资排辈现象依然存在。在此基础上,提出高校研究生导师绩效评价的原则与思路,比如,师德问题一票否决,重视研究生培养质量,重视个人发展,分类评价。最后,构建研究生导师绩效评价指标体系。

关键词: 研究生导师, 绩效评价, 代表作评价, 分类评价

Abstract: This paper firstly analyzes main problems of current performance assessing systems in China: ignoring the assessment of teachers' ethics, students' training level, personal development and differences and the allocation of indicators for graduate students. Faced with this reality, we propose the principle of evaluating the performance of teachers. For example, the default of teachers' morality cannot be tolerated. And we should pay attention to the quality of postgraduate training, personal development and classification evaluation. Finally, we formulate the index system.

Key words: Graduate tutor, Performance assessment, Representative evaluation, Assessing by classification

中图分类号:

G645.1

钱玲. 破“五唯”背景下研究生导师评价体系研究[J]. 创新创业理论研究与实践, 2021, 4(19): 88-90.

QIAN Ling. Performance Assessing System for Graduate Tutor under the Background of “Break Five Only”[J]. The Theory and Practice of Innovation and Enntrepreneurship, 2021, 4(19): 88-90.

[1]	霍楷, 王亚楠. 艺术类专业毕业设计（论文）分类考核内容及评价方式研究[J]. 创新创业理论研究与实践, 2021, 4(14): 133-135.
[2]	郑建存. 众创空间三大问题的研究现状及趋势探讨[J]. 创新创业理论研究与实践, 2020, 3(4): 196-198.
[3]	肖志雄, 刘筠. 众创空间绩效评价体系研究[J]. 创新创业理论研究与实践, 2020, 3(23): 10-12.
[4]	汪大金. 高校创新创业项目质量管理与绩效评价研究[J]. 创新创业理论研究与实践, 2020, 3(2): 16-20.