创新创业理论研究与实践 ›› 2025, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (10): 1-3.

• 理论研究 •    下一篇

发展新质生产力背景下本科生工程实践能力评价探究

刘盾1, 李莹2, 曾宪群3   

  1. 1.东莞理工学院 高等教育研究所,广东东莞 523800;
    2.东莞理工学院 教学质量监测与评估中心,广东东莞 523800;
    3.东莞理工学院 教务部,广东东莞 523800
  • 出版日期:2025-05-25 发布日期:2025-08-25
  • 通讯作者: 李莹(1988—),女,河南鹤壁人,硕士研究生,讲师,研究方向:大学文化、高校教学管理、质量评价,电子邮箱:1158715368@qq.com。
  • 作者简介:刘盾(1988—),男,北京人,博士研究生,副研究员,研究方向:粤港澳大湾区高等教育、工程教育、高等教育管理。
  • 基金资助:
    东莞理工学院2022年度高教研究重点项目“新型高水平理工大学质量文化研究”(GJKY202202); 东莞理工学院2022年度高等教育教学改革项目“卓越工程人才培养视阈下本科生工程实践能力评价探究”(202202024); 2023年度广东省本科高校教学质量与教学改革工程建设项目“通识教育视域下地方性高校学生批判性思维培养路径与发展评价研究”

Exploring the Evaluation of Undergraduate Engineering Practice Ability under the Background of Developing New Quality Productivity

LIU Dun1, LI Ying2, ZENG Xianqun3   

  1. 1. Higher Education Research Institute of Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan Guangdong, 523800, China;
    2. Teaching Quality Monitoring and Evaluation Center of Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan Guangdong, 523800, China;
    3. Academic Affairs Department of Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan Guangdong, 523800, China
  • Online:2025-05-25 Published:2025-08-25

摘要: 工程实践是卓越工程人才培养的关键环节。工程实践能力评价改革受到新质生产力发展、深化教育评价改革、提升工程人才自主培养质量的三方驱动。目前,工程实践能力评价改革存在理念与需求不符、模式与现实需求不匹配、结果反馈作用发挥不充分等问题。为弥补传统评价方式的不足,需更新理念之“道”,提升方法之“术”,完善技术之“器”,超越单一评价的逻辑向度,回归科产教融合的评价范式,迈向技术迭代的实践之路,以全面提升本科生的工程实践能力评价水平。

关键词: 新质生产力, 本科生, 工程实践, 工程能力, 科产教融合, 评价

Abstract: Engineering practice is a key link in cultivating outstanding engineering talents. The reform of engineering practice ability evaluation is driven by three factors: the development of new quality productive forces, the deepening of education evaluation reform, and the improvement of the quality of independent training of engineering talents. At present, there are difficulties in the reform of engineering practice capability evaluation, such as the mismatch between the concept and demand, the mismatch between the model and the actual demands, and the insufficient feedback effect of the results. To compensate for the shortcomings of traditional evaluation methods, it is necessary to update the“way”of concepts, enhance the“technique”of methods, improve the“tool” of technology, go beyond the logical dimension of single evaluation, return to the evaluation paradigm of integrating science, industry, and education, and move towards the practical path of technological iteration, in order to comprehensively improve the evaluation level of undergraduate engineering practice ability.

Key words: New quality productivity, Undergraduate, Engineering practice, Engineering capability, Integration of science, industry and education, Evaluate

中图分类号: